Eiserhowers significance in civil rights Essay Example for Free

Eiserhowers signifi brookce in civil in good orders EssayHow significant was Dwight D Eisenhower in improving civil rights for African Americans during his presidency (1953-1961)? Eisenhower was both partially significant and not, regarding improving civil rights during his presidency. Reason being, Ike was criticized for a variety of decisions he made. Arthur Larson emphasised that he had a failure to babble out. However, David Greenberg believed Eisenhower was significant and stated that it was his judicial nominees who made the revolution possible.Eisenhower was the 34th President of the United States (1953-1961) and presided during key moments xin the civil rights movements including the Montgomery Bus Boycott, brownish v Board act, The Little Rock 9 and the gracious Rights Act of 1957. He was a republican and believed that each state should pay off their own laws and cases shouldnt have to be dealt with by the president. These events lead to many historians and peck to question whether Eisenhower was effectively managing the cases and how significant he was to change in courtly Rights for African Americans.Although Eisenhowers significance was strongly opposed by many, he clearly played a extensive part in improving civil rights for African Americans. The astuteness of the Brown v Board case was really significant in improving civil rights for African Americans. Eisenhowers appointment of Earl warren as head word Justice of authoritative Court was really significant. Earl Warren was pro civil rights and desegregation and stated that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. This command was due to the circumstance that blacks werent being given the same opportunities as white children at school.He knew they had the same potential but werent provided with rough-cut resources. This was in favour Oliver Browns case and the Supreme Court was in favour of equality in both races. This progress meant that Eisenhower made huge sig nificance towards improving Civil Rights as it was him who appointed Earl Warren and this wasnt the first time that there were equal opportunities for black children in school. However, Ike described appointing Earl Warren as The biggest mistake I ever made. This suggests that he wasnt happy about the outcome of the case and that he had conflicting ideas in parity to Earl, regarding the Civil Rights.This signifies that Eisenhower was disappointed that the case had finished at a quick pace and didnt like the changes that actually happened. Although he said he regretted it, he still did an extremely significant thing by employing Earl Warren as it helped improve Civil Rights. Going moxie to a previous refer, Smith stated that his judicial nominees who made the revolution possible. In this case, Smith is obviously referring to Eisenhowers appointment of the judge Earl Warren as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.Earl Warren was an extremely respected man and was given a big role in being responsible to fight for Oliver Browns case. This reinforces the fact that Eisenhowers employment of Earl Warren was a major factor in improving Civil Rights. An opposite key event that was important throughout Eisenhowers presidency was the intervention at Little Rock. Eisenhower stated that the mob rule cannot be allowed to all override the decisions of our courts which was encouraging as it meant that he wouldnt allow African Americans to be threatened in school, a place where people should learn and feel safe, not terrified.This was hugely significant as it proven that Eisenhower was determined to desegregate schools and have a positive change for African Americans. Eisenhower also stated that leniency can encourage defiance. This also showed that Eisenhower was cause to lure everyone into changing their racist ways as he demanded everyone to stay strong. This shows improvement to Eisenhowers attitude. This is significant as, since he was the President, the fact he said this would have encouraged everyone to be brave and fight discrimination.However, Eisenhower confronted that our enemies gloated over this incident which shows that Eisenhower only acted due to the fact of the Cold War and he didnt want other Countries to see America in a negative perspective. This shows that Eisenhower didnt act from free will, he was concerned about other peoples views and so reacted. Overall, in regards to the intervention at Little Rock, Eisenhower was extremely effective. On the other hand, Eisenhower also acted in ways that werent significant in improving Civil Rights for African Americans.In key events such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott, Sit-ins and Freedom Rides he didnt act at all however in Little Rock 9 he was forced to act due to the opinions of other countries and people regarding America which was shown when he stated our enemies are gloating over this incident as he intervened due to others opinions. He also had the opinion that there is a state law o n boycotts. This shows that he was a republican and believed all cases should be dealt with by the government, not the president. This links with the fact that Eisenhower was quite laid sand as he believed it wasnt his state to deal with problems. James Farmer stated we planned the freedom rides with the intention of creating a crisis which shows they wanted to provoke a reaction from Eisenhower. This did alert Eisenhower, however, because of his laid back attitude he didnt intervene which caused a delay in the improvement of civil rights, showing he wasnt significant. Eisenhower wasnt significant because of his personalized beliefs. He privately stated that making people do things by force is plain nuts. This shows how Eisenhower had an attitude that people should do what they want without people interfering.This shows that Eisenhower wasnt significant because if he had used his power as president correctly he could have made a big difference. This is seen in the quote by the his torian David Greenberg the Fight for civil rights demanded the use of the bully pulpit which shows that historians consider his failure to intervene to have been a massive set back to the civil rights movement. Historian Roy Wilkins said if he fought the Second World War like he fights for civil rights, we would all be speaking German right nowadays.This shows that Eisenhower is not the best person to have in a position of authority. This clearly states that he didnt put in much endeavour regarding fighting for civil rights. Showing he wasnt a good leader and so is insignificant. To conclude, after analysing a range of sources, both negative and positive, we can see that Eisenhower was significant in improving the lives of African Americans during his presidency. He presided over key events, most importantly, the appointment of Earl Warren and The Little Rock 9.Although, some may say he only acted due to pressure from other countries, this does not change the fact that he played a huge part in improving civil rights for African Americans. Under the presidency of Eisenhower things did change, no matter if he was forced to do it or not, he still helped improve Civil Rights for African Americans which is all that matters. As Roy Wilkins stated, if he fought the second World War like he fights for civil rights, we would be speaking German right now which shows he didnt put in much effort in improving Civil Rights for African Americans.